Talk:Muthu (film)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:40, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:40, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Infobox, Lead

• Infobox looks good.
• Remove the comma after "June 1995".

 Done Kailash29792 (talk) 12:22, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Plot, Cast

• The plot section passes WP:FILMPLOT.
• Remove the comma after "company".
• "passerbys" → "passerby"
• Remove the comma after "agreed".
• Remove the comma after "chase Ambalathar".
• Remove the comma after "new zamindar".
• The cast section looks good.

Solved all. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:22, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Production

• The first sentence feels short (try merging it with the next).

See how it is now. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:08, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

• "editing handled" → "editing was handled"

 Done. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:08, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

• Remove the comma after "Raja Malayasimman".

 Done. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:08, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

• Remove the comma after "approached for the role".

 Done. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:08, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

• Remove the comma after "reluctance".

 Done. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:08, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

• Recite references after every WP:QUOTE.

Themes

• No issues here.

Music

• Convert this into a subsection in #Production per WP:FILMMUSIC.

 Done Kailash29792 (talk) 12:15, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Release

• This section looks good.

Reception, Awards

• Since these two sections are short, merge them together as two subsections under #Reception, preferably titled "Critical response" and "Accolades".
• "simple hearted" → "simple-hearted"
• "consisent" → "consistent"
• The first section also appears to end abruptly so try fixing that.
• Also remove the <br /> in the table (unnecessary).

Japanese version (Muthu Odoru Maharaja)

• Current header feels kinda long. Maybe just "Japanese version"?
• The last sentence in the second paragraph is unsourced.

Resolved both. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:06, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Legacy

• No issues here.

References

• Archive sources.

Archived everything possible. --Kailash29792 (talk) 11:47, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·