Talk:Music programs of South Korea
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ariel Qi.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:18, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Original research?
edit"Most music show wins" section is just one huge WP:OR, no one OFFICIALLY counts this "music show wins" on any published source or something, it is actually a fan-made "competition" to count these wins (its just a weekly chart show like billion of others charts outside of Korea, its not really an "award" or something even if they do get a trophy), not to mention it is constantly edit-warred with adding sub-group wins, I think it should be removed and only other sections, like "Longest consecutive wins by an artist" and "Most awarded songs" should stay as this is much easier to verify and sources actually do exists...even the official websites of these shows don't track these wins and the overall number of wins are nowhere listed 86.58.36.235 (talk) 11:12, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Discuss the reversion
editDiff of reversion: [1]
Reason of take it back: There's source for why some music show have sometime manipulate results, but every source is filtered by link blacklist filters. 1Way4Together - J. Smile | Awards and similar items are not for sales 02:22, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- @J. Smile (Love & V.A.V.I): Per WP:PROVEIT, the burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material. I don't understand what you mean by sources being filtered but if you can't properly source something for whatever reason then it will be removed. You can see a list of reliable kr sources here. - Ïvana (talk) 02:47, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Sources is flitered in here mean the link of these information I add get blacklisted, therefore I can't add it. See also: Special:Log/spamblacklist. 1Way4Together - J. Smile | Awards and similar items are not for sales 02:50, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- @J. Smile (Love & V.A.V.I): Well, then they're not valid sources. They're blacklisted for a reason. The petition site you tried to link falls under WP:LINKSTOAVOID, and the kpopmap site is not considered reliable per WP:KO/RS. You should check that list and look for other sources that won't get filtered. - Ïvana (talk) 04:30, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Sources is flitered in here mean the link of these information I add get blacklisted, therefore I can't add it. See also: Special:Log/spamblacklist. 1Way4Together - J. Smile | Awards and similar items are not for sales 02:50, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Controversies about win
editInaccurate results is a notable controversy. I don't know why User:Ïvana delete it, despite the fact that I provide a reliable source one (like Laboum-IU case). 1Way4Together - J. Smile | Awards and similar items are not for sales 09:10, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Propose for remove of unreliable information
editSince this removal would be controversial, I will bring here to get consensus:
The information that is only cited use source listed at WP:KO/RS#UR will be deleted. If have at least one source that is reliable; remove the unreliable source and retain that information. 1Way4Together - J. Smile | Awards and similar items are not for sales 04:37, 15 August 2021 (UTC)