Talk:Multiocular O
 | The contents of the Multiocular O page were merged into Cyrillic o variants#Multiocular O on 10 November 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Comment
editThe linked PDF seems not to be available any more. Replace the source with http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n3194.pdf ? -- pne (talk) 08:31, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
I use the "Multiocular O" as my logo. DeseretIsGreat (talk) 19:29, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Merger?
editIt's kind of cool that Unicode allowed for these exotic glyphs to be embedded. But do such letters, some of which occur only once in the entire corpus of Old Church Slavonic manuscripts, really need separate articles? I think we'd better merge them, either into one page that describes them all or simply into a new section of O (Cyrillic). What do you think? Steinbach (talk) 16:30, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- All other archaic Cyrillic characters have their own articles, so I'd prefer to keep this article. around - - mathmitch7 (talk/contribs) 17:34, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- I like the consistency of each article having its own character, and I believe there is room for expansion of these articles eventually, as people do more research both on the manuscripts and on Unicode itself. These glyphs are very rare in the actual corpus, but their inclusion in Unicode brings notability. Also this article is a small and special joy, and I think there is room for a little bit of joy when encyclopedically appropriate. Dreamyshade (talk) 23:35, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Stub status
editIs this article really a stub? It seems pretty comprehensive to me. Can anyone suggest how it could be expanded? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Citruswinter (talk • contribs) 21:08, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
OK no replies. Having read the instructions at Wikipedia:WPW/RATE I am updating the article class in the template at the top of this page to B, while also requesting a second opinion from interested parties with the reassess parameter. I'll remove the stub template from the bottom of the main page too. Citruswinter (talk) 20:05, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
What sound does this make?
editjust.. what sound. 85.26.189.240 (talk) 06:09, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- same as normal cyrillic o, which is the letter it's replacing in the one occurrence. 8.46.69.35 (talk) 23:03, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Ocular O Article
editMerge discussion has been moved to Talk:Monocular O#Ocular O Article. jnestorius(talk) 08:38, 9 April 2023 (UTC)