Talk:Multi-agent reinforcement learning
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
I just reviewed this under Wikipedia's new article curation / review process
editThanks for your work on this article. I just reviewed this under Wikipedia's new article curation / review process.
I did have a few concerns like whether or not this material should simply be in another article, that the current references do not establish compliance with wp:notability, and the by it's own description perhaps it should be named Muiti-agent machine learning instead. IMO all three of these are likely to get sorted out as the article grows from a stub and I passed it. Nice start! Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 21:54, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
2024 reassessment
editI believe this is now C-class as there are many sources and most of the appropriate sections are outlined. However, there are still sentences whose source is not clear, impeding verifiability. Many sources are hosted on arXiv, which is just a preprint repository so such sources should only be used if they are also published in a peer-reviewed academic journal.
- Good example (see journal article): Hernandez-Leal, Pablo; Kartal, Bilal; Taylor, Matthew E. (2019-11-01). "A survey and critique of multiagent deep reinforcement learning". Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 33 (6): 750–797. arXiv:1810.05587. doi:10.1007/s10458-019-09421-1. ISSN 1573-7454. S2CID 52981002.
- Bad example: Duéñez-Guzmán, Edgar; et al. (2021). "Statistical discrimination in learning agents". arXiv:2110.11404v1 [cs.LG].
Links to software are magnets for adverts and promotional writing, so I've removed "Software" altogether. If written about in journals or reviewed by experts then individual cases could be re-added with secondary sources and commentary. A very minor style point is that contractions like "isn't" are not used in Wikipedia's voice. — Bilorv (talk) 13:43, 13 February 2024 (UTC)