Talk:Mountain View, Colorado

December 2009

According to the Colorado Bureau of Investigation's Annual Reports, Mountain View reported having only 3 officers in 2008 and 6 in 2007. I believe that that the news article that was probably incorrect.The CBI annual reports dating back to 2002 have the number of sworn officers between 3 and 6, consistently. CBI is a pretty reliable source. Is there anyone else besides CBS4 that states Mountain View Police Department has 12 Officers?

Also is there a reference that states that MPD have one of the highest density of police officers in the world. The comparison is between the New York which is large city with over 8 million people and Mountain View which is a small town with about 500 people doesn't seem like the proper comparison . The reference doesn't mention Mountain View but the largest cities and countries in the world. 5 or 6 officers would be a minimum to keep the place open 24/7. Even if there were 12 officers that would only be about 2 officers per shift. I'm sure there are hundreds of towns across America with similar numbers. This part of the article seems a bit misleading.

Do The traffic ticket problem and who the police pulled over seem to be trivial and unnecessary to print in a Wikipedia article? Dbkilo (talk) 14:51, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

References

Map of the municipal area?

This article could use a map of the little municipal area, and how it fits in with the neighboring municipalities adjacent to it. Anyone know of a good GPL licensed map, or might be willing to make one? Adding {{reqmap}}. The existing maps are of too large an area to show the (really dinky) extent of this tiny municipal enclave. N2e (talk) 19:36, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mountain View, Colorado. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5uRWqBo2m?url=http://www.dola.state.co.us/dlg/local_governments/municipalities.html to http://www.dola.state.co.us/dlg/local_governments/municipalities.html
• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5uRWp2Zfd?url=http://zip4.usps.com/zip4/citytown.jsp to http://zip4.usps.com/zip4/citytown.jsp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080720031016/http://home.att.net/~mvpd/history.html to http://home.att.net/~mvpd/history.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://home.att.net/~mvpd/urgent_letter_3_2_09.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:22, 7 February 2018 (UTC)