Talk:Moula Ali hill
Latest comment: 8 years ago by NeilN in topic This hill is definitely notable
 | A fact from Moula Ali hill appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 June 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
This hill is definitely notable edit
Of course, this hill is notable and deserves a separate article. Just because some of the content resembles another article's does not mean we should merge this article with it. Thanks Supdiop (Talk/Contribs) 14:57, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- This article is ripped off entirely from another article. This article contains no original contribution. All contents in this article are already covered in the the main article. Hope confusion is cleared.Sarvagyana guru (talk) 00:27, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- Sarvagyana guru I created this article from entirely different sources. This hill article is new, so they covered about this hill in Moula Ali article. Now it has it's own article. Your reason for merge is not correct. No original contribution? Come on. Did you even read all that? I searched for sources for two days and I worked very hard on this article. "This article is ripped off entirely from another article." is not correct. Thank you. Supdiop (T🔹C) 01:13, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose merge It's clear the hill is notable on its own. Merging this article into Moula-Ali would overweight that article. --NeilN talk to me 02:56, 22 October 2015 (UTC)