Talk:Monumentum

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)

Reviews in Aardschok

edit

There are three CD reviews of Monumentum published in Aardschok (March 96, p.52; March 00, p.57; and Nov 02, p.63)(www.aardschok.nl). I signed up at their website, but they must not have their archives digitized. I don't know if there's a way you can mention them, or if you care to, but it's a pretty decent publication. Unfortunately they don't seem to have published an entire article on them. If you ever get your hands on them I'll be happy to translate. Drmies (talk) 02:40, 2 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Notice: This article does not verifiably establish WP:MUSIC

edit
 

In my opinion, this article either does not verifiably satisfy the Notability criteria for Music, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it is a Copyright violation.

Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable sources in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.

Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:Blackmetalbaz (talk · contribs), and other recent contributors to this article, to make some constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

To better understand why I have used this template, please read Flag templates for deletion warnings ... I realize that some of the expressed possible concerns may not be appropriate in this case. Happy Editing! — 72.75.110.31 (talk · contribs) 04:26, 2 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

In response: verifiability is established by the entry on Rockdetector; there are also listings for all the Monumentum albums on Allmusic. Notability is established by multiple albums on notable labels (in this case Misanthropy Records and Tatra, a sub-label of Moonfog; they also have releases on Necropolis and Obscure Plasma), and presence of Roberto Mammarella (founder of the highly notable Avantgarde Music). Another editor mentioned the use of Myspace as a source; this can often be a problem but surely isn't when used to cite the band's influences (their own words!)? The article definitely needs further sourcing from third party sources; I'm going to look for interviews and reviews... bear in mind it was only created yesterday! Blackmetalbaz (talk) 11:47, 2 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
Kewl ... have fun! I came back and put a little lipstick on this pig (with the {{MySpace}} tags and consolidated refs), and then I lost interest in it, so I'm gonna Move On. :-)
BTW, I removed it from Category:Flagged articles as well. — 72.75.110.31 (talk) 12:21, 2 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Monumentum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:09, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply