This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
@Knoterification: If you really dislike the current controversy section, a Wikipedia policy compliant way to "fix" it is to introduce an "opposing" view if it's backed by notable, reliable sources. I won't complain and will happily support you if you add, backed by a reference, something like "According to Brazilian commentator XYZ, this controversy is overblown, and the monument is fine because (insert reason here)." However, as stated before, you can't rewrite what the protesters / opposers think - they might be wrong, but that's still their opinion, and they don't think the Bandeirantes were worthy of commemoration. Their reasons for this belief need to be explained, too, just as the reasons for supporters of the monument can also be explained. SnowFire (talk) 21:17, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
