Talk:Monitor (Mar Novu)

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Buidhe in topic Requested move 8 February 2021

Untitled edit

The Monitor's face was first shown in GI Combat#274.


I have expanded and rearranged the text of the article. Wilfredo Martinez 20:26, 1 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Monitor / Watcher edit

Would it not be worth mentioning that the Monitor is a DC equivalant to Marvel's Watcher?

I disagree. Other than the habit of watching other characters, both the Monitor and the Watcher have vastly different goals, personalities, and basic characterization. --DoctorWorm7 21:46, 4 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
parhaps 'equivilant' would be the wrong term... The Monitor would best be described as based on The Watcher.--RedKnight 16:59, 10 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Even less of that. Wolfman, in the foreward to the Crisis TPB, says that he concieved of the Monitor as a sort of super-librarian kind of figure. --DoctorWorm7 09:54, 7 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
As you wish, but seeing as the words 'Watcher' and 'Monitor' are virtually synonymous, regardless of the vision of the actions or functions, it is difficult to ignore--RedKnight 16:59, 10 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
The Monitor is The Watcher. 90.134.108.229 (talk) 21:28, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, we have a source that says that one based on the other. And mentioning they ahve names with similar means is silly, should we list any character with a name that means "Computer Screen" as well? Duggy 1138 (talk) 02:42, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

The watcher just watches but the monitor actually intervenes Shazamwillofgods (talk) 19:24, 13 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Merge Survey edit

  • merge even though he is working with alternate versions of himself, isn't this essentially the same character. Same medium, universe, character ect? 66.109.248.114 03:53, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
    • no merge - The introduction of factions within the Monitors warrants a separate article. --Basique 10:10, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
no merge these are new characters. They are based off an older character, but are distinctly different.--Marhawkman 12:41, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
No merge per above. --DrBat 03:53, 15 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
No Merge per above. They are indeed new characters, and should be treated as such. ZZ 03:57, 15 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Consensus established as don't merge.~ZytheTalk to me! 21:33, 2 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Crisis03.png edit

 

Image:Crisis03.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 09:26, 27 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Monitor.PNG edit

 

Image:Monitor.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Crisismonitor4.jpg edit

 

Image:Crisismonitor4.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Link to Alan Kistler's Guide to the Crisis edit

I've removed the link, as the page has moved; also, I couldn't find the article on the new Monitor Duty page http://www.thehutch.com/monitorduty/2006/02/alan-kistlers-list-of-articles.html. Perhaps once they fix it over there we could put it back in. Hope I did this right. Audionaut (talk) 10:55, 19 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ignore me. Found the right link now (http://www.thehutch.com/monitorduty/2005/10/alan-kistlers-guide-to-the-cri.php) and put it back in. Audionaut (talk) 10:58, 19 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Monitor (comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:48, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 8 February 2021 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Unopposed move (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 08:00, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply



Monitor (comics)Monitor (Mar Novu) – per WP:NCCDAB, and there are other characters in DC Comics claim the name "Monitor" like Anti-Monitor, "Bob", etc. NeoBatfreak (talk) 06:15, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.