This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Instead of "oral loan w/o witnesses + claimed payment", a better case should be chosen. After all, even if there are witnesses, Jewish law accepts a claimed payment in the case of an oral loan (see Bavli Ksuvos 18a "קי"ל המלוה את חבירו בעדים א"צ לפרעו בעדים"). In that case, it's not really a miggo, since his claim has inherent, independent credibility. McKorn (talk) 02:44, 21 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
