Talk:Microfluorimetry

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Microfluorimetry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://crl.berkeley.edu/flow_cytometry_basic.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:55, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

non-observational / lab-environment limits not mentioned in limitations

hi, just noticed when browsing that there's not a perhaps sentence or two, on the potential-for error-from, if not also insufficiencies of scopeXimplications-of-results in design in microFLM, when it comes to the effect of when trying to observe natural bio-chem actions, OUTside, of larger indirect-causation local/attached electrochemical and magnethochemical, thermochemical, etc...

... forces, indirectly affecting a particular action, through indirect casuation - a simple example, might be trying to test an action of a cell-cluster's reaction to a strong alkine source of electronegativity at one end of a stem,.. BUT WHEN tested in the lab, not tested during the morning, when say, another INITIATED action/sequence, might change the CONDITIONS, in which the action in particular, is then acting IN.

or say in some design for micro-tech in a micro-satellite,.. is tested in the lab, with some convoluted pathway for something... but when taken into space, the indirect effect of one partictle type interacting with a nearby capacitor, causes a large enough EMF to cause indirect EMF effects inside one section of the fluid pathway (say a micro-cooling-system's mesh's 'arteries' ) , and you get coagulation/blockages,...

ie, removing all but the particular part tested in biology, no matter how well ATTEMPTED, to be re-created in the lab, will always have the potential for COMBINATION errors.

ON THE PAGE... a sentence or two describing it's lab-observational limits, would be appropriate.

Vurrath (talk) 10:37, 9 April 2018 (UTC)