Talk:Mekedatu

India: Karnataka / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Karnataka (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Rivers: Waterfalls Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Waterfalls task force.

Lemma: Mekedaatu or Mekedatu? edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Is there any reason why the article comes under the lemma Mekedaatu - daatu written with two aa -, when in the article except in one case the spelling is Mekedatu, same as in all given references? Bangalorius (talk) 19:30, 9 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Shivanasamudra Falls edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

had to remove complete nonsense about Shivanasamudra Falls - just btw, there are more than 30 bigger falls only in India ... just see http://www.worldwaterfalldatabase.com/country-tallest-waterfalls/India/

Bangalorius (talk) 17:03, 15 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mekedatu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061206014309/http://www.bangalorebest.com/discoverbangalore/sightseeing/bang-around_scenic1.asp to http://www.bangalorebest.com/discoverbangalore/sightseeing/bang-around_scenic1.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:36, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic