Talk:Mega Man 7/GA1

Latest comment: 6 years ago by TarkusAB in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TarkusAB (talk · contribs) 02:31, 17 June 2018 (UTC)Reply


I'll do this one. TarkusABtalk 02:31, 17 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Plot

  • I haven't played the game, but I've played other Mega Mans and I don't feel the plot in these games is of much significant importance. I feel it could be explained in a paragraph. I think this plots goes into too much detail, like "Mega Man counters that he is "more than a robot". (In the Japanese version, Mega Man stands in silence.)", mentions of every brief skirmish and fight, and the theatric play-by-play.
  • Plot should come after gameplay, especially in a game more gameplay-centric

Gameplay

  • Info at the end of paragraph one is missing a source.
    • For some strange reason I can't find an online source on this. Its in the game so I might need to source the game. GamerPro64 03:53, 26 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
      • In that case, could we find a source that just give the general flow without all the boss detail? (i.e. Only some robots are available at the beginning, as the player continues, more robot masters are unlocked to play). Most of the detail there now isn't helpful. I'm not familiar with the game so the boss names tell me nothing. Since we can't find a source, maybe that's saying something about how important it is. TarkusABtalk 06:29, 2 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • No other comments, pretty well written

Development

Reception

Lead

  • The video game was released in Japan I don't think I've ever read someone write "The video game...", maybe just "The game..." works better?
  • The infobox is overpopulated with credits. According to the template documentation, if three or more people are credited for a role, leave it out or put into prose if that important. Only the "lead" people should be in the infobox.
  • The Windows release is just emulation, no? Should be removed from infobox.

Other

  • Images are good
  • No Copyvio issues
  • Sources should be archived (Recommended not required)

I will review Dev, Reception, Lede tomorrow. TarkusABtalk 04:15, 23 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

@GamerPro64: OK I am done with my first pass. TarkusABtalk 12:35, 23 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
@TarkusAB: I took care of answering all your comments. GamerPro64 03:34, 29 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
@GamerPro64: Responded to three items. TarkusABtalk 06:29, 2 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
@TarkusAB: I responded to your comments. GamerPro64 02:42, 10 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
OK cool looks good, pass. TarkusABtalk 19:33, 10 July 2018 (UTC)Reply