Talk:McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070703003824/http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=980802601&ResourceType=Building to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=980802601&ResourceType=Building
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:53, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018) edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051027110423/http://www.mcgeorge.edu/brownvboard/mclaurin.htm to http://www.mcgeorge.edu/brownvboard/mclaurin.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:47, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Some Proposed Changes edit
Hello, I am employed by Boston University's Fineman & Pappas Law Libraries. After reviewing this Wikipedia page, I believe that information from one of our faculty's scholarship might provide a valuable addition to this page. I would appreciate it if this requested edit could be reviewed.
{{request edit}|D|T}
Add two sentences to the end of the 'Findings' section: Ultimately, McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents is significant for its emphasis on the diversity rationale.[1] Specifically, the case recognizes of equality interests for students of color, especially in higher education.[2]
Cf2022 (talk) 05:40, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Cf2022
References
- ^ Feingold, Jonathon (2019). "Diversity Drift". Wake Forest Law Review Online. 9: 20.
- ^ Feingold, Jonathon (2019). "Diversity Drift". Wake Forest Law Review Online. 9: 20.