Talk:Mazzarino Friars

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sicily Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sicily, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sicily on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SicilyWikipedia:WikiProject SicilyTemplate:WikiProject SicilySicily articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by slon02, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on August 8, 2011.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Neutrality edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I have some concerns about the neutrality of the "Controversy" section. It seems to be written with an anti-Catholic slant, using words such as "despite overwhelming evidence", "ultra-Catholic", and "propaganda". I don't have any problems with the section being there, but I think that it could be changed to make it more neutral. --Slon02 (talk) 01:48, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'll try to fix it, but consider that some italian newspapers are actually "ultra-catolic" (like the "Osservatore Romano", official newspaper of the most conservative wing of the Vatican); propaganda is the correct term, consider that in 1950s Italy socialism and catholics parties were in a harsh fight, and both sides owned newspapers used to spin public opinion; evidences were "overwhelming" as in "beyond any reasonable doubt". Maybe there's a better way to put it. --Jollyroger (talk) 09:02, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mazzarino Friars. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.carnelutti.it/it/chisiamo.htmls/doc3_32.PDF
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111008112233/http://www.fondazionefrancese.org/suicidato.htm to http://www.fondazionefrancese.org/suicidato.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:03, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic