Talk:Maybach I and II

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Fortifications / European / German / World War I / World War II C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War I task force
	World War II task force

Injured non-chief of staff edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"...a raid on 15 March that injured Chief of the Army General Staff Hans Krebs"

But according to Wikipedia, deputy chief Hans Krebs didn't become Chief of staff until April 1.2A02:AA1:1623:ED3:2D4D:DA11:5F38:24F6 (talk) 10:49, 27 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

"at Maybach II in a safe at Zossen" etc edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Maybach IS in Zossen, as we have been told in the article, so why the "at Zossen"? Answer: Because this is a typical phrase in the the literature (I think Shirer says something very similar).

Then there's "excerpts from the diary of Wilhelm Canaris". Why would anyone make "excerpts" from the diary? Answer: A mistranslation. It should say "parts of the diary".94.191.152.198 (talk) 10:23, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

From https://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/11-30-45.asp it's evident that this was a semi-official diary, with conference notes etc., and that Erwin Lahousen kept copies of his own contribution. That's different, never mind the above comment. 2A02:AA1:161C:FF50:BD14:BD9F:94D8:BF87 (talk) 10:35, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic