Talk:Maryland Route 135

Latest comment: 11 years ago by TCN7JM in topic GA Review
Good articleMaryland Route 135 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 30, 2013Good article nomineeListed

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Maryland Route 135/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 06:02, 29 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

It's unfitting to call this a short article, but after the last article I reviewed, anything's a step down. TCN7JM 06:02, 29 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Route description
  • Is Oakland Drive the current alignment of unsigned MD 825B or former?
    • Oakland Drive is MD 825B. It may never have been part of MD 135. I removed the reference to the old alignment of MD 135.  V 04:18, 30 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • intersecting the old alignment of MD 135, Swanton Road, and a few roads on the south side of the highway - It's hard to tell. Is Swanton Road an appositive identifying old MD 135 or an item in a list?
    • I removed the reference to the old alignment of MD 135. It may never have been part of MD 135.  V 04:18, 30 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • So WV 46 exists in Maryland? Or is it just a road leading to WV 46?
    • It is a road leading to WV 46. I rewrote the sentence to make that clear.  V 04:18, 30 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • The use of "Paxton Street" to end one sentence and start the next doesn't look too good. Maybe use "this street/road".
    • I rewrote the sentence to remove the repetition.  V 04:18, 30 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Okay, those are my only questions. It's  on hold for now. TCN7JM 19:24, 29 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your review, TCN7JM. I also fixed three dead links.  V 04:18, 30 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
I didn't think to check those. I can go ahead and pass the article now. TCN7JM 14:56, 30 March 2013 (UTC)Reply