This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Punjab, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Punjab on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PunjabWikipedia:WikiProject PunjabTemplate:WikiProject PunjabPunjab-related articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I am a new page reviewer and I am sending this article back to draft for the second time. The topic of the article exists and there is at least one redlink in mainspace to Mariamabad.
The article was created by a user who was shortly afterwards blocked as a sockpuppet and was engaged in the creation of a run of geostubs on Pakistani towns. This seems to have been a factory-like approach to pushing up their edit count, because the articles are all original research, with mostly the same sources just cut and pasted into every article to give an appearance of sourcing when there is none.
In the current version of the article for example sources 1, 2 and 3 bear absolutely no resemblance to the points in the article they purport to verify. This article is a freestyle creative essay with a sprinkling of irrelevant sources to make it look acceptable.
Any volunteers working at AfC should review it very carefully and only accept it back into mainspace after a major clearout and rewrite. All the best Mccapra (talk) 05:12, 19 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
