Talk:Mary Gabrielse

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Irlpinkiepie in topic Notability?
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mary Gabrielse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:58, 2 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Notability?

edit

ran across this page on a random search and i'm not sure that mary is notable enough to warrant a separate article? the two references listed don't seem to qualify as significant coverage; the first is a source from the subject's relative, and even then mentions her only tangentially in relation to an art project, and the second is no longer available either on the web or through the wayback machine, as best i can tell. the first of the two external links, too, is primarily about her uncle johannes and does not mention her by name, while the second no longer seems to reference either, and all the sources i can find are either in relation to the aforementioned art project or copied directly from this article.

while i have no doubt that mary is a real person, and it doesn't look as though there's anything libelous in the page, a trivial mention from a relative doesn't seem to meet the qualifications for notability? it looks like User:Eno Lirpa was the one to have split the page, if they have any sources; if there aren't any further sources, though, i think that this page ought to be merged back with its source, if not deleted entirely. Irlpinkiepie (talk) 17:02, 3 April 2022 (UTC)Reply