Talk:Marshmallow Challenge

Engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Education Low‑importance

	Education portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

A page from my blog is cited as a source, but my blog is only summarizing and reflecting on what I learned from a different web page. The ReadWriteWeb page describes the contents of a TED talk. So really, other than the TED talk by the guy who invented the marshmallow challenge, and the marshmallow challenge web site, is there enough evidence that independent sources have to fifer? I thought it was cool enough to blog about, but is it really noteworthy, according to Wikipedia standards? Dennis G. Jerz (talk) 00:07, 7 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Good point. I will try to dig up some other sources, or maybe I will nominate it for AfD. Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:41, 19 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Okay. I added some more refs. They are 3rd-party, and some refer to the challenge as subject and not TED talk as subject. I guess it now passes WP:GNG, but it ain't pretty. I will give it several months and see if it develops. Right now, I'm not 100% happy with it existing as an article. I, you, or somebody else might AfD it, and I would be happy with that. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 21:02, 19 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic