Talk:Marriott World Trade Center

Proposed move

Since there's no need for disambiguation, this should be at Marriott World Trade Center, without the "(hotel)" bit. Move blocked by redirect page. Kafziel ^Talk 00:32, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Survey

• Support as nom. Kafziel ^Talk 00:32, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Support/speedy move. Seems an obvious thing to do. --Aude (talk) 01:04, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Comments

• Went ahead and made the move. If anyone objects, we can of course discuss here. --Aude (talk) 01:06, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Lead

Perhaps the lead of this article should mention that the hotel was destroyed on 9-11. Dsmdgold (talk) 02:26, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

The WTC Marriot damages

The Marriott hotel(WTC 3)was actually partially collapsed on 9/11/2011. Sadly, most people think that the debris had destroyed all of the building. Actually, it seems that a corner of the first three floors had survived with major damage to the windows, interior, frame, and exterior. It was later taken out in March, 2002 to make way for memorial service.--JMWpedia (talk) 02:16, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Demerge back from page Three World Trade Center

These pages were merged without discussion or stated reason a few years back (2011), to my bewilderment. The building would seem to be notable, not just the address/plot of land it was on; further, the infobox was deleted during the merge. The content would come from the section placed on Three World Trade Center, which is substantively unchanged from the merge. Please feel free to raise objections, etc, at this talk page, or see the original discussion at this talk page section. Techhead7890 (talk) 10:47, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Marriott World Trade Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090927183623/http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/harvey.html to http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/harvey.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.marriotthotels.com/NYCWT/meeting.asp
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.marriott.com/epp/default.asp?MarshaCode=NYCWT

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:13, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Marriott World Trade Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121126063510/http://www.sept11marriottsurvivors.org/ to http://www.sept11marriottsurvivors.org/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140718195459/http://www.nabe-web.com/am2001/stories.htm to http://nabe-web.com/am2001/stories.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:44, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Bold significant alternative titles

@MONGO MOS:BOLDSYN says "significant alternative titles (which should usually also redirect to the article) are placed in bold". The Marriott World Trade Center was known under all names that I mention: World Trade Center 3 (WTC 3 or 3 WTC), the World Trade Center Hotel, the Vista International Hotel, Vista Hotel and the Marriott Hotel, and I provided references for these names. Some of these indeed redirect to this page, while others redirect to its successor, Three World Trade Center at 175 Greenwich Street. Following the rule as outlined in the Manual of Style, all these names should be in bold. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 17:48, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Those aren't significant titles...they are all redirects to this page anyway, except one.--MONGO (talk) 19:48, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

How have you determined those 'aren't significant titles'? All of the names mentioned are based on a reliable source saying these were/are all commonly used names for this building. "Vista International Hotel" was its official name from 1981 until 1995, and "Vista Hotel" is an obvious abbreviation of that; at the very least these should be in bold. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 00:38, 5 October 2018 (UTC)