Talk:Marlene Clark
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Copyright problems edit
This article relies far too heavily for creative content on its primary source, [1]. Not only does it heavily mine quotes, problematic under our non-free content policy, but it uses verbatim and minimally altered supporting material from the source. For examples, consider the following:
| Source text | Article text |
|---|---|
| Ironic, considering Clark first reached the public eye as a model for various New York magazines and newspapers during the late 1960s -- “a wonderful time, because more and more opportunities like that were opening up for black women,” she notes. These gigs led to bit parts in late-‘60s filmed like FOR LOVE OF IVY, MIDNIGHT COWBOY, and -- most notably -- PUTNEY SWOPE..... | Clark first reached the public eye as a model for various New York magazines and newspapers during the late 1960s. Clark noted her experiences as a model as “a wonderful time, because more and more opportunities like that were opening up for black women.” These gigs led to Clark getting offered bit parts in films made in the late 1960s like For Love of Ivy (1968) with Sidney Poitier, the Academy Award for Best Picture winner Midnight Cowboy (1969) with Dustin Hoffman and Jon Voight, and most notably Putney Swope (1969) which was directed by Robert Downey, Sr. |
| ...Clark joined the cast during fall 1976.... a rare opportunity to exercise her comedic skills. | Clark joined the cast during the fall of 1976 and the show presented Clark in a rare opportunity to exercise her comedic skills. |
These examples demonstrate a reliance on the organization and the creative language of the source. While facts are not copyrightable, creative elements of presentation – including both structure and language – are.
As a website that is widely read and reused, Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously to protect the interests of the holders of copyright as well as those of the Wikimedia Foundation and our reusers. Wikipedia's copyright policies require that the content we take from non-free sources, aside from a few brief and clearly marked quotations in accordance with WP:NFC, be rewritten from scratch.
The article has been replaced with a notice of these copyright concerns that includes directions for resolving them. If the material can be verified to be compatibly licensed or public domain or if permission is provided, we can use the original text with proper attribution. If you can resolve it that way, please let me know if you need assistance with those directions. Otherwise, so that we can be sure it does not constitute a derivative work, this article should be rewritten; there is a link to a temporary space for that purpose in the instructions which now appear in place of the article. The essay Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid these issues. The article Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches, while about plagiarism rather than copyright concerns, also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism". --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:55, 14 July 2015 (UTC)