Talk:Mark Porter (general practitioner)
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Place of birth
editBorn in Ross or Stroud? The text conflicts with the infobox at the moment. Ghmyrtle (talk) 08:49, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Inside Health
editI thought it was important to mention this series, so I have. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 21:44, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
I've begun a discussion on the Monmouth School Talkpage regarding the criteria for including alumni. You may wish to contribute. For ease, I've reproduced the entry below. Regards. KJP1 (talk) 22:15, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Alumni revisited
editIn the discussion above, it was suggested a minimum criteria for inclusion as an alumni would be that the subject has their own Wikipedia entry. I actually wonder whether this is sufficient. Looking at a number of the Sporting and Arts and Entertainment alumni, their Wikipedia articles are of very poor quality. They are often short, poorly referenced - if referenced at all, and a number have all the hallmarks of autobiographical entries, created either by their subjects, or by collaborators. That said, I fully appreciate the very great difficulties of deciding on alternative criteria. Hence, I'd appreciate others' thoughts. KJP1 (talk) 18:20, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mark Porter (general practitioner). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311095020/http://archive.thisisstroud.com/2005/7/13/2740.html to http://archive.thisisstroud.com/2005/7/13/2740.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:01, 3 June 2017 (UTC)