Talk:Mark Pirie
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Far too much unreferenced in a BLP edit
Quoted verbatim, here are the relevant Wikipedia guidelines for biographies of living persons:
Editors must take particular care when adding information about living persons to any Wikipedia page.[1] Such material requires a high degree of sensitivity, and must adhere strictly to all applicable laws in the United States, to this policy, and to Wikipedia's three core content policies:
- Neutral point of view (NPOV)
- Verifiability (V)
- No original research (NOR)
We must get the article right. Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources. All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be explicitly attributed to a reliable, published source, which is usually done with an inline citation. Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced – whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable – should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion
In good faith, I have thus pruned out of the article all unreferenced material that is not "explicitly attributed to a reliable, published source". As noted I can do so in a BLP "without waiting for discussion". The WP:BURDEN guidelines state that the burden to provide evidence rests on the shoulders of the editor adding information, and that the editors must not re-add information removed because of lack of sources. The guideline say: "Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source." So you must not simply restore the material! Provide neutral third-party reliable sources or leave the information out.
Best regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 06:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
You have removed references to Auckland University Press. Not justified. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.147.112.211 (talk) 09:36, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- Sign your posts. By the way I restored that one referenced point.George Custer's Sabre (talk) 09:46, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
References
- ^ People are presumed to be living unless there is reason to believe otherwise. This policy does not apply to people declared dead in absentia.