Talk:Mark Changizi
Latest comment: 9 months ago by Tacyarg in topic Doesn’t address Changizi’s COVID work
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Doesn’t address Changizi’s COVID work edit
Changizi has a Twitter account and Youtube account dedicated to promoting anti-vax and anti-lockdown theories. This seems to be his current profession. He has about 55,000 followers on Twitter, so he has a fairly large audience. Narwhalfalafel (talk) 09:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
- Have had a search, but not a lot of reliable sources about. Best I can find is "Mark Changizi, Daniel Kotzin, and Michael Senger were frequent Twitter users who often wrote with skepticism or criticism of the government’s approach to COVID-19, such as questioning the effectiveness of masks or vaccines ... " and the resulting legal cases.[1] Have not put this in the article as I am unsure whether Cato.org is an RS. My guess is not, due to its inherent bias. Tacyarg (talk) 11:05, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
References edit
- ^ Bembridge, Nicole Saad; Berry, Thomas A (5 December 2022). "Changizi v. Department of Health and Human Services". Cato.org. Retrieved 10 July 2023.