Talk:Mariana dam disaster

Latest comment: 3 years ago by SquashEngineer in topic Context

Comments edit

The two articles are clearly talking about the same event. I vote for the quick merge, to avoid duplicated efforts. I vote to keep Bento Rodrigues dam disaster as the main title, being the other a redirection. However, the current content of Disruption of the Dams of Bento Rodrigues has hight quality, and should be moved to the other article. Pcgomes (talk) 16:45, 13 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

I agree.--Io Herodotus (talk) 20:54, 15 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bento Rodrigues dam disaster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:24, 18 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Class action suits in other countries edit

The current version of the article mentions "Class action suits" in the USA, Australia and the UK. Do they have anything to do with Samarco's disaster? Mateussf (talk) 06:17, 18 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Context edit

"There are concerns about contamination of the nearby Rio Gualaxo do Norte [pt], a tributary of the Doce River, due to the toxic substances stored at the facility." This statement is provided without sufficient context. It refers to cross contamination to another river, yet refers to substances stored at a facility. What facility? What is the relevance or impact? SquashEngineer (talk) 13:27, 23 April 2021 (UTC)Reply