Talk:Marc Birkigt

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Switzerland Low‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

SE 5a the most effective aircraft of WWI?

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Without a citation, this is very questionable. A similar argument could be made for the Sopwith Camel and Fokker D.VII. However, since this is an article about an engineer and not the efficacy of WWI aircraft, it would be better to simply remove it. I'll give it the customary two weeks and if no one has any objections, out it goes. Flanker235 (talk) 00:44, 20 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

The following phrase has been removed due to lack of citation (in reference to the S.E.5a):

"the latter of which was considered to be the most effective military aircraft of WW I"

Flanker235 (talk) 11:20, 14 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic