Talk:Mao Tse Tung (film)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Reviews edit

For future use. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 11:31, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

You remove other people's contributions from an article for your "future use"? 84.73.134.206 (talk) 11:54, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
It was just posted to the article as a link, not used as a reference for anything; it's prudent to note it down somewhere instead of just removing it entirely in that case. GRAPPLE X 16:42, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
Those are obviously valid references about the movie's international impact. Why should they be removed in the first place? 84.73.134.206 (talk) 16:51, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
It's only a reference if it's used as one; summarise what the source is saying and then append the link as a citation, but just posting a link to an article isn't enough. GRAPPLE X 17:00, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
I moved them as they were just a collection of external links, with no context. Rather than delete them (and lose their use), I moved them here, so someone who wishes to expand the article properly will have direct access to them and assess if they contain anything worth citing. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:06, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mao Tse Tung (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:30, 1 June 2017 (UTC)Reply