This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Talk:Manchester Coalfield is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Given the explanation in the text which precedes it, does the title of the first column want to be altered to just 'mine' or, less confusingly, 'seam' which is the standard term for a thickness of coal in a rock sequence, rather than the local term? cheers Geopersona (talk) 18:40, 6 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
I am no expert, just interested, so at your suggestion I will change the title to seam. Thanks for reading.--J3Mrs (talk) 14:56, 13 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
I'm no expert either but it seems clearer this way. Good to see others taking an interest in the coalfields. I've been surprised how poor the coverage on Wikipedia has been on the British coalfields hitherto, though certain mines have been well documented. cheers Geopersona (talk) 17:28, 13 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
