Talk:Malaysian Airline System Flight 684
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on August 1 2008. The result of the discussion was delete. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contested deletion
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because I am re-writing it. This crash is also notable in that ALL passengers and crew SURVIVED --Petebutt (talk) 00:47, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
I have re-written parts but large parts are how I would have written it anyway. If that still violates copyvio then there is something wrong with the system!--Petebutt (talk) 01:39, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Petebutt, I understand your reaction and agree that this topic is notable but the copyright protected material should not remain on Wikipedia. Would you agree that several revision deletions, per WP:CFRD #1, are necessary? I propose that the revision deletions should be made to everything prior to this revision, where you made the most substantial changes to the copyright protected material. Looking forward to your response! - tucoxn\talk 03:33, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- Rather than delete, just re-write the bits that trigger the copyvio!!--Petebutt (talk) 08:13, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- @Petebutt: You did not respond to my question. You already stated that you believe the offending sections have already been adequately re-written. An administrator should delete the old versions of the article that contain copyright protected passages. Do you agree or disagree? Thanks. - tucoxn\talk 08:41, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- NO! There is no need!!--Petebutt (talk) 10:33, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- I consider this cleared up and the matter closed. Thank you very much for your responses. - tucoxn\talk 11:13, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- NO! There is no need!!--Petebutt (talk) 10:33, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- @Petebutt: You did not respond to my question. You already stated that you believe the offending sections have already been adequately re-written. An administrator should delete the old versions of the article that contain copyright protected passages. Do you agree or disagree? Thanks. - tucoxn\talk 08:41, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:22, 1 February 2022 (UTC)