Talk:Malak Ghorbany

Stoning info

On the day of her punishment, the woman's hands are tied behind her back as she becomes covered from head to toe in winding sheets and is placed seated in a pit. The pit is then filled up to her chest with dirt and the dirt is tamped down. At that point, members of the community are invited to murder her by hurling rocks at her. The Iranian government has mandated the size of the stones that are to be used in this act of public execution, they must not be too small as to prevent ultimate death, nor must they be too large that they could cause the girl's death "too soon."

The above is general info appropriate perhaps to the stoning article (which already has most of it) but not this article. If some of the controversy has been because the method is regarded as unduly cruel, then this can be mentioned with appropriate sources. However we should only talk about this briefly, there is no need to go in to detail for something which is covered in the stoning article. But it is not appropriate for us to talk about how stoning is carried out in Iran in this article. Even more so since the above paragraph is not very NPOV. 'Murder' is debatable and most of it is also applicable to men executed by stoning in Iran as well so the reference to women and girls probably unfairly makes it seems like this is something exclusive to women (of course, women may be more likely to be sentenced to execution by stoning but that's a different issue). Please remember that however much something may disgust you, we still have to be NPOV and only include relevant info. Nil Einne 12:10, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

This article

This article is very incompletely reported, very inaccurate, and is based to large degree on sources that don't meet Wikipedia standards. I suggest someone rewrite it based mostly on Amnesty International reports, see [1] (search for Malek). 220.253.187.152 (talk) 13:46, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Improving the article

I don't think the sources are the problem, as there are lots of materials that can be found about this case from reliable sources on the internet. The problem seems to be lack of proper attention to the page. It needs to be revised for grammar, style, etc. Also, it may not be a bad idea to get in touch with Lily Mazahery's office to get a photo and other materials for this case. I remember that she had the copyrights to a photo of Malak Ghorbany a while back when it was published in a newspaper, the name of which I now can't remember. They have tons of good info. about these cases, and I would contact them myself, but I've already bugged them so much that I am embarrassed to do so again for a while! --Autoplay91 (talk) 14:36, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Malak Ghorbany. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060720131236/http://www.turkishdailynews.com.tr/article.php?enewsid=48977 to http://www.turkishdailynews.com.tr/article.php?enewsid=48977
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061019124822/http://www.cnsnews.com/news/viewstory.asp?Page=%2FNation%2Farchive%2F200608%2FNAT20060823c.html to http://www.cnsnews.com/news/viewstory.asp?Page=%2FNation%2Farchive%2F200608%2FNAT20060823c.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:57, 13 January 2018 (UTC)