Talk:Madras Regiment

POV Pushing

I have edited this article. Some of the previous information were absolutely wrong. The source of information is http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/india/rgt-madras.htm and the numerous other government websites. The glorious heritage of the madrasis/tamils have been expalined clearly. User: Chola Yadava ( Jan /2 /2010 ) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chola yadava (talk • contribs) 23:27, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Don't use Wiki for POV pushing. Thanks. Axxn (talk) 01:59, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010 (UTC)

I am not doing "POV pushing". You are doing POV pushing.

The source of my information is

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/india/rgt-madras.htm

http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/LAND-FORCES/Units/Infantry/101-Madras.html

http://madrasregiment.org/globalsecurity.htm

I kindly request you to modify the contents appropriately. If you are not willing to change the contents then I will report to the editor with the actual information. Please be neutral in your approach.

"The four great kingdoms of Chalukyas, Cholas, Pandiyas and Cheras ruled various parts of South India till the end of 9th Century AD. Medieval India saw the rise of the Cholas whose empire extended from West Bengal in the east to south of Bombay in the west and covering the entire South India less the Cheras in Travancore and encompassing the islands of Sri Lanka, Malaysia, Cambodia and Sumatra. The soldiers of the Madras Regiment are the descendants of the Pallavas, Cholas, Pandiyas, Telugus and Cheras whose history of valour is unparalleled. "

What sort of rubbish is this? How are the Chalukyas and such things related to the Madras regiment, which was created by the British East India Company? And for your kind information. The Madras here refers to the "Madras Presidency" and not Chennai. Out of the 20 battallions, 10 were from Mysore, 4 from Malabar and 3 from Travancore-Cochin. And you are editing that the Regiment is "Tamil" speaking. "soldiers of the Madras Regiment are the descendants of the Pallavas"..... that is the joke of the century. 99% of them would have never even heard the word Pallava. Axxn (talk) 06:08, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

If you are saying that Tamils constitute the majority of the recruits, then why they contribute just 2.3% of the IMA officers? (Against 5.26% of Kerala & 3.02% of Karnataka) ?

Also see Table-1 here. Recruits from Kerala makeup 5.38% of all recruits in Indian army. (Compared to 5.09% from Tamil Nadu). Still you think Tamils make up the majority in Madras Regiment? Axxn (talk) 11:18, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Dude what nonsense are you talking? The report you have given in from 1987. And the article itself says that majority of the recruits are Tamil speaking followed by Malayalam, and that the orders are mostly given in Tamil. Stop being biased. None of the Indian regiment is regional language speaking all of them are English. But it is the language of the recruits that is being said here. Most recruits in Madras regiment belong to Tamil later followed by Kerala. And the high percentage of Tamils make the officers train and give them orders in Tamil, just like punjabi in sikh or gorkali in ghorka regiment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.75.82.151 (talk) 19:17, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Madras Regiment insignia.png

Image:Madras Regiment insignia.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 22:13, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Madras Regiment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110609211456/http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/LAND-FORCES/Units/Infantry/101-Madras.html to http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/LAND-FORCES/Units/Infantry/101-Madras.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:31, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Article - possible vandalism / Disruptive editing

Hi @Nagannaa:

This is regarding your last edit. Removal of facts and references with a certain bias against the topic is not acceptable. Any new edits should avoid removal of previous referenced material, without a valid reason.

Akk7a (talk) 10:39, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

I have NOT removed any facts or references but classified different commanding superiors of the force. Nagannaa (talk) 12:31, 24 June 2023 (UTC)