Talk:Macbeth (1971 film)

Concerns about "Bloodiest"

"Meanwhile, he had set his mind on adapting perhaps the bloodiest work in English literature, Shakespeare's Macbeth..."

Compared to, say, Marlowe's Barabas, Macbeth certainly falls short. I can see "one of the bloodiest..."

But put that aside; I strongly agree with one of the other posters. A very nice article indeed!

Yankoz —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.57.20.50 (talk) 01:34, 4 February 2007 (UTC).

Fleance! Where did he "fly" to?

Why does Polanski not let the audience know what happened to the character Fleance in the end? Of course, Malcolm was the legitimate heir to the throne in the end, but wasn't Fleance supposed to be king, according to the witches? Le Anh-Huy 06:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

I believe Fleance was next in line for the throne. I'd flee too.DocEss 17:41, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

---The witches' prophecy doesn't refer to Fleance himself becoming king, but rather his (supposed) distant descendant Robert II, grandson of Robert I the Bruce by Robert's daughter Marjorie, who married Walter the Steward, whose family was traced back to Banquo. Shakespeare's Fleance is, though, Banquo's only child, and thus if he is killed, the whole thing will fall apart.

It was a tribute to James I. James believed he decended from the real Banquo, so thats why Shakespeare put it in. Fleance wasn't supposed to be next in line to the throne (Malcolm was, because Duncan named him his heir before his death, thus the returning of the 'real' monarch, instead of Macbeth), but it was Banquo's subsequent children that would lead to James I. Disinclination 17:08, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Needs mention of the Third Ear Band soundtrack (which includes the ballad "Fleance") which was released on LP. 76.27.232.185 (talk) 19:57, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Well Done

Whoever wrote this article has a unique and admirable command of the English language; he should be commended.DocEss 18:07, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the compliment, DocEss.

You are welcome. Hey - as an aside, could you include some discussion somewhewre about a popular superstition? The stupid-stition goes like this, as far as I recall: orally quoting any portion of MacBeth in public brings terrible luck upon the quoter. Is there anything to this or has someone walked me up the garden path?DocEss 21:29, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Personally, I don't know about this superstition, only that the play is bad luck if you mention its name in a theater although I had a drama teacher in high school who would be sure to say it once per show! Hew 13:03, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

I have heard for years that in theater circles speaking the name "Macbeth", especially if involved in a production of the play, is considered bad luck. "The Scottish Play" is used instead. It is also part of the folklore that productions of the play are notorious for mishaps. I am not superstitious myself, but... In the 1970s, I saw a performance in Pittsburgh (Christopher Plummer, Glenda Jackson). During the first witches' scene, one of the witches caught fire. The other actors broke character & frenzily patted out the flames, as did a number of stagehands. The buzz in Heinz Hall for the next 20 minutes or so kept anyone from hearing any more lines. 64.128.36.79 14:09, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

My high school's drama coach (Mr. Cassiato) would fritz if anyone'd say "Macbeth" aloud anywhere near his theater. 76.27.232.185 (talk) 19:59, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

A NPOV violation?

In the section that reads:

"Such a nihilistic conclusion effectively renders the action of the play—and Shakespeare's hopeful suggestion that virtue and justice will ultimately prevail—as altogether meaningless and absurd. In doing so, Polanski considerably alters and diminishes the psychological complexity and emotive grandeur of Shakespeare's story. Instead of a high tragedy and cautionary tale about the devastating effects of corrupt ambitions put into action, Polanski presents a melodramatic and profoundly cynical illustration of how power normally changes hands in a hostile and meaningless universe"

I'm not going to suddenly remove it without allowing for discussion. I however believe it should be removed because I don't think Wikipedia exists to criticze film. I believe it violates the NPOV stance that Wikipedia holds to.

Is it perhaps a quote? If so it can be written "Film critic Joe Blogs believes..."

I'm not going to put one of those "NPOV Violation" notices on the front page yet as pages such as these are often watched very closeley, but if there's not discussion, perhaps I will.

Other than this, its a wonderfully written article. (not to say the section isn't well written, it just doesn't fit. Oh and I don't agree!) Hew 15:53, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Macbeth's vision.jpg

Image:Macbeth's vision.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 00:51, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Macbethmovie.jpg

Image:Macbethmovie.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 00:52, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Out damned spot.jpg

Image:Out damned spot.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:02, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Plot

The films plot should be added.--Paleface Jack (talk) 05:17, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Macbeth (1971 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20130412034020/http://www.waterytimes.com/index6.php?no=6&location=N006C04&txt=N006C04T01 to http://www.waterytimes.com/index6.php?no=6&location=N006C04&txt=N006C04T01

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:23, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Mrs Macbeth

In the DVD version (at least , in the one I got from Netflix), Lady Macbeth's nude soliloquy is considerably abridged from the original. Does anyone know anything about this? Surely it deserves mention?

Paul Magnussen (talk) 04:16, 24 June 2018 (UTC)