GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Rosguill (talk · contribs) 22:35, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Failed "good article" nomination edit
This article has failed its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of January 25, 2018, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: fail
- 2. Verifiable?: not evaluated
- 3. Broad in coverage?: pass
- 4. Neutral point of view?: pass
- 5. Stable?: fail
- 6. Images?: not evaluated
This article has received significant edits more than once a week since its nomination, thus it fails stability criteria. Additionally, the article's prose could use improvement, and sections of the article, particularly the lead, are overly detailed and should be further summarized and condensed.
When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— Rosguill (talk) 22:40, 25 January 2018 (UTC)