Talk:MS Veendam

(Redirected from Talk:MS Aegean Majesty)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Andrewa in topic Requested move 31 December 2022

SS Veendam

edit

Might anyone have any information on the SS Veendam, which in 1923 was providing service between Boulogne-sur-Mer, France, and New York City? --Thisisbossi 02:28, 15 February 2007 (UTC)Reply


I wonder when she was built. HAL/Carnival may be hiding that fact? I can't find any info before she was retrofitted with the her new stern and rooms, etc. Her prow and general lines look more like the sleek classical transatlantic ocean liners' than the silly modern cruise ship's bobbing-hotel look. I sailed on her before Carnival, around 1979 from Miami thru the Caribbean on a 2-week. You'd think from the propaganda uhm... I mean official literature, that she didn't exist even then. Silly wabbits!
  • Ship Facts [from HAL/Carnival website] ms Veendam
  • Ship's Registry: The Netherlands
  • Passenger capacity: 1,350
  • Crew members: 580
  • Gross Tonnage: 57,092 grt.
  • Length: 719 feet
  • Beam: 101 feet
  • Maximum speed: 22 knots
  • Dedicated: January 1996, by actress Debbie Reynolds

Doug Bashford--68.127.81.33 (talk) 20:05, 28 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 31 December 2022

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Andrewa (talk) 15:42, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply


MS Aegean MajestyMS Veendam – The 2020 move to Aegean Majesty was premature and undiscussed; ship has remained laid up with no plans to be put into operation under that name. By far the best known name is Veendam, under which it cruised for 24 years, per NC-SHIP, which is a reasonable application of WP:COMMONNAME, and WP:NAMECHANGES in particular, to ships, where ephemeral and temporary name changes are commonplace. Davidships (talk) 14:31, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Support as per proposers points Lyndaship (talk) 15:44, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Support per proposal. Until a ship actually sails under a name, page should not have been moved. Llammakey (talk) 20:26, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.