Talk:MLIR (software)
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dialects section
editIn the 'Dialects' section, I would explicitly state what the purpose of an operation is (i.e. take two operands and compute a function on them). It is very basic but could help as a clarification Fpeverelli (talk) 12:54, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Operation definition specification
editI would add a brief explaination of what tableGen is Fpeverelli (talk) 13:28, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
The structure of the article is commendable, with distinct sections and appropriate references for all the pertinent topics discussed, resulting in an all-inclusive coverage. Nevertheless, readers who are not familiar with LLVM and its framework may face difficulty in grasping the concepts presented. Ilgeco1995 (talk) 13:29, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Overview
editThe article is clear, informative and well written. It is clearly very technical, but it manages to convey the important concepts. Explaining some terminology (e.g. PHI nodes) either by adding links or a brief sentence may help with clarity Fpeverelli (talk) 13:38, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Is it code or pseudocode?
editThe three code snippets are unclear whether they are C/C++ or pseudocode Cellomario (talk) 14:18, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Advertising
editIs there a reason why the opening paragraph is content-free advertising copy taken from the project tagline? "optimal use" isn't something an encyclopedia should be regurgitating just because a splash page says it. 2600:1700:3D22:2800:7838:6CE0:4B3B:DEB8 (talk) 21:01, 8 June 2024 (UTC)