Talk:M51 (missile)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the M51 (missile) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editDo we have any data about the CEP of this missile?--Arado 15:47, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on M51 (missile). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.astrium.eads.net/en/programme2/m-51-juy.html - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101011095502/http://www.defpro.com/news/details/16676 to http://www.defpro.com/news/details/16676/
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense-news/2016/05/10/airbus-and-safran-agree-space-launcher-joint-venture/84178824/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:50, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:24, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
directly derived from...Ariane 5?
editIs there any source for "The three-stage engine of the M51 is directly derived from the solid propellant boosters of Ariane 5"? The linked source doesn't state anything like that. Also it is "common knowledge" (without me being able to provide you a source) that solids for ICBMS can be stored for a very long time and still function perfectly. Solids for carriers like Ariane 5 have a shorter life and the propellants become unusable after some time. SpaceRacer (talk) 10:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
"M51 (missile" listed at Redirects for discussion
editThe redirect M51 (missile has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 11 § M51 (missile until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:31, 11 February 2024 (UTC)