Talk:M-77 (Michigan highway)

Assessment

The article's history is too short to merit B-class. CL — 02:15, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Short of inventing history, it has all of the history available. Imzadi1979 (talk) 02:50, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

As the master of assessors Keiryn once told me, some articles just never will get to B-class; just because the information isn't present doesn't mean it doesn't exist. M-77 still has a history, albeit a poorly-documented one. So, out of curiosity, MDOT doesn't have a page of history for all its routes like UDOT does? CL — 20:32, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

No, it doesn't. And the last time I asked for information about a highway through FOIA, MDOT quoted me a price tag of a grand for the research time for stuff on M-28. In the case of M-77, it was assigned. It was paved. It had a section straightened. It still exists. If you think that's a small history, see M-67. Imzadi1979 (talk) 21:47, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Well in any case, Algorerhythms has already reassessed. I think the problem is UTSH has its B-class standards too high. That, or I'm just making excuses as to why you guys are first in the scale CL — 02:54, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on M-77 (Michigan highway). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.michigan.gov/hal/0%2C1607%2C7-160-17451_18670_18793-53515--%2C00.html
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6AqxSurw0?url=http://www.michigan.gov/documents/MDOT_NHS_Statewide_150626_7.pdf to http://www.michigan.gov/documents/MDOT_NHS_Statewide_150626_7.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061105190954/http://www.fws.gov/midwest/seney/index.htm to http://www.fws.gov/midwest/seney/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 20 May 2017 (UTC)