Talk:Mỹ Sơn

Vietnam High‑importance

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Hinduism High‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Improving the history section (content).

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I think this page is rather poorly documented. Notably the history which is very limited. Some good reference can be found on Google (they may need double checking but are good starting points! Here's a few of them:

[1]The kingdom of Champa, AncienWorlds.net
[2]Champa's Childer - contains a good history of the Champa Kingdom

84.103.32.42 (talk) 21:49, 27 January 2008 (UTC) LudovicReply

Vietnam War

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The US nearly levelled the site and all it gets are two perfunctory sentences in the article? It doesn't even mention that the Viet Cong used the site as a base since they knew the US wouldn't bomb it due to its historical significance, and that it took an Act of Congress to get them to do so. OldManInACoffeeCan (Mukkakukaku's alt for public terminals) 22:13, 3 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Also doesn't mention that said bombing was a war crime per the Hague Convention of 1907. — Red XIV ^(talk) 06:26, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Not a war crime if its being used by military forces, which My Son was. Mztourist (talk) 06:39, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mỹ Sơn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:33, 25 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic