Talk:Lysichiton camtschatcensis

Supposed bad smell

Japanese sources (WP:ja, plant books etc, which are likely to be reliable) do not mention any bad smell, and there are numerous websites on which Japanese writers ask "Why skunk cabbage?" since it does not smell bad. The genus Lysichiton includes the American "skunk cabbage", and the WP:en article (again likely to be reliable) says that this does smell. The name "Asian skunk cabbage" therefore does not imply that the plant stinks*, only that it is _related_ to a plant that stinks. I don't know what the UK reference actually says, but I guess it simply confirms my guess that this plant does not stink at all.

• I wrote "smells", then remembered Dr Johnson.

...Later: so I rewrote it. Can someone check what the UK reference says, or that it is in line with what I wrote: "mentions a sweet smell".

Imaginatorium (talk) 14:48, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Armitage and Phillips write "There are conflicting reports concerning the smell of Lysichiton camschatcensis. Thomas (1976) says the flowers have a sweet smell as does Stearn (1932), though the latter also notes that others have found them to have no smell at all. Our experience of plants at Wisley is that the flowers smell very disgusting, though they are not quite so offensive as those of L. americanus." (p. 157 of the reference in the article)

So it seems best to say that the smell is variable. Peter coxhead (talk) 17:07, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lysichiton camtschatcensis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6VqJ46atN?url=http://www.bsbi.org.uk/BSBIList2007.xls to http://www.bsbi.org.uk/BSBIList2007.xls

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:30, 28 May 2017 (UTC)