Talk:Lynx (protocol)

Expert review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

There was no response. Willk send the article to AfD. --B. Wolterding 18:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

---

This review has been announced on the talk page of WikiProject Computer networking. Comments should be added on this page, below.

As part of the Notability wikiproject, I am trying to sort out whether this topic is notable enough to have its own article. The article currently does not cite independent sources, so its notability is questionable. Can you tell me whether independent sources can be found, and so the article should be kept, or whether it should rather be removed?

Your opinions are welcome; please add your comments below. --B. Wolterding 19:13, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Notability

The article survived an AfD with result "no consensus". In my opinion, it definitely needs more sources to have its notability established. I will therefore replace the "importance" tag with "notability". Let's wait whether sources are added. --B. Wolterding 18:40, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

How common is this protocol? (or support for this protocol?) Makes a difference to notability arguments. RJFJR (talk) 22:30, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

I can't judge notability of this subject, but no articles link to it. ike9898 (talk) 00:18, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Plagiarized

Much of the text in the article at it currently stands is lifted verbatim from the Lynx Documentation file (which is linked at the bottom, but cited nowhere). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.169.194.219 (talk) 16:02, 10 September 2009 (UTC)