Talk:Lupino family

Latest comment: 12 years ago by CommonsNotificationBot in topic File:1870 Sara Lane.jpg Nominated for Deletion

George Hook Lupino

edit

The revised text reads too much like original research, yes the published texts supporting the prior version of the article may be mistaken, but they are what we have to rely on. To do otherwise is original research.

The link put in to support the OR is a pointer to the lead page of a theatre collection, and not to supporting information. This all needs to be cleaned up. If the claim is supported - and a quite google doesn't seem to (using scholar, also) - then the article needs to be changed, but if it can't be, then it needs to stay in its supported version.

Any thoughts? Kbthompson (talk) 16:47, 31 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:1870 Sara Lane.jpg Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:1870 Sara Lane.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:1870 Sara Lane.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:26, 16 April 2012 (UTC)Reply