Talk:Ludwik Kowalski
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Self Promotion
editThis article is nothing more than just self promotion and was created and constantly edited by the person himself. The Rypcord. 22:37, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
- It looks like some anonymous user based in Los Angeles has taken upon him/her-self to agree with you and vandalize the page. I don't particularly feel like restoring it, when nothing of significance links to this page and I agree with the sentiment if not the action. - 209.131.48.66 (talk) 19:58, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
- It is painfully clear this was written by the person that is the subject of article. This article hardly meets Wikipedia:Notability... 68.54.135.8 (talk) 05:38, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- So how do we get it deleted? 173.172.95.186 (talk) 15:12, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Notable
editI found this man's diary to be writings of a "high degree of interest", because he is a unique, documented product of the intersection of politics and science. Therefore leave the article in its current form for being "notable" by the earlier definition in quotes. The encyclopedia will be the worse for not having this article. --196.215.189.102 (talk) 19:30, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Self Promotion
editI agree that this article is nothing more than just self-promotion and it is clear, also from links to it from popular Polish magazines such as POLITYKA, that it was created and it is constantly edited by the person himself. I also agree that this article hardly meets Wikipedia standards becasue it is poorly written and contains mostly (controversial) political opinions, not facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.170.255.231 (talk) 06:29, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Hoover Institution elevates status
editPlease re-read revised article: as of January 2011, the Hoover Institution had accepted this man's diary, papers, and photos into its large, historical archive related to the former Soviet Union: do not delete this entry.--Aboudaqn (talk) 03:02, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Correcting a false assumption
editI am not the author. The Wikipedia article was written by a person I do not know, years ago. My only contribution was to provide the author with the link to my publications and presentations (in replying to the email in which he sent me the link to the article).
Kowalskil (talk) 15:26, 20 August 2014 (UTC)Ludwik Kowalski (see Wikipedia) August 20, 2014
Physicist, not Nuclear Physicist
editPer email sent from Kowalski to Krivit:
Fri, 1 Dec 2006 08:04:13 -0500 (EST) From: Ludwik Kowalski < Subject: introduction Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 08:02:32 -0500 I am a Ph.D. physicist. Here is an outline of my educational and professional background: a) BA and MA in electrical engineering (Warsaw Polytechnic Instutute) b) Ph.D. in Physics (University of Paris, 1963) c) Postdoctoral appointment at Columbia University (1964-1969) d) Teaching physics at Montclair State University (1969 to 2004). _______________________________________________________ StevenBKrivit (talk) 17:40, 7 November 2016 (UTC)