Talk:Ludlow Group

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Ludlow Group is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Outdated source material

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Use of the EB 1911 is of dubious value as much of what was written then no longer applies today. Readers should be aware that terminology and thinking have moved on. Any experts wish to have a go at making the appropriate corrections to the article? cheers Geopersona (talk) 05:18, 29 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. Added tag to hopefully attract expert attention. Animalparty (talk) 19:31, 26 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

It needs to be completely rewritten, explaining the historical significance and the current nomenclature that replaces it. Mikenorton (talk) 10:45, 1 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic