This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
One question about the son of Aemilia Paulla Secunda, Quintus Aelius Tubero <Consul 117>. Is it correct? Consuls in 117BC were Lucius Caecilius Metellus Diadematus and Quintus Mucius Scaevola Augur and "Consul Quintus Aelius Tubero" appears in 11BC, from the list in Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Roman_Consuls#2nd_century_BC). The birth year of Aemilia Secunda cannot be later than 181BC from her younger half-brothers'birth years, therefore 117BC is realistic for the son of Aemilia to be a consul, however 11BC is reasonable for her grandson. I have no materials to check this. Please confirm.Yu8330 (talk) 08:09, 7 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Sculpture (in the image) has not been identified as Lucius Aemilius Paullus Macedonicus
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The identity of the sculpture assocated with this article is the subject of much speculation but has never to my knowledge been positively confirmed as Lucius Aemilius Paullus Macedonicus. It is presently described as "The Hellenistic Prince" at Brindisi's Provincial Archaeological Museum. It seems very misleading to for the caption to say "Bronze sculpture identified as Lucius Aemilius Paullus, circa 167 B.C." - and not just because there seems to be a lack of supporting evidence. Lucius Aemilius Paullus and Lucius Aemilius Paullus Macedonicus were different people. They were father and son. Ljredux (talk) 13:51, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
