Talk:Lottery payouts

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gambling Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Article stub

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

My name is Glen. I want to say thanks for your interest in lottery payouts. Let's work together and make this a great article! Glen.Daler (talk) 18:50, 25 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Could you check your reference for "due to competition from illegal numbers on daily numbers games"? It would seem the meaning is "illegal numbers or daily numbers games" but that may not be correct. -- 98.111.146.179 (talk) 22:30, 13 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Needs work

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I think this article needs work. However I wonder is it really worthy of being a whole article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AxlSong (talk • contribs) 16:54, 4 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic