Talk:Los Hijos del Espanto

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Wugapodes in topic GA Review
Good articleLos Hijos del Espanto has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starLos Hijos del Espanto is part of the Los Espantos series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 19, 2016Good article nomineeListed
September 18, 2016Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 18, 2016.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that more than 10 wrestlers have worn the Espanto mask, including Espanto I, Espanto II, Espanto III, Espanto IV and V, Los Hijos del Espanto, Espanto Jr., his son Espanto Jr., and Mini-Estrella Espantito?
Current status: Good article

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Los Hijos del Espanto/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wugapodes (talk · contribs) 23:08, 11 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Note This review is part of a series of reviews by an editor on articles of a similar topic. Because of this, the various reviews may reference each other. Please also see Los Espantos, Espanto I, Espanto II, Espanto III, Espanto IV and V, Espanto Jr., Espanto Jr. (CMLL), and Los Hijos del Espanto if things are unclear. Disclosure: Both the nom and reviewer are participating in the WikiCup, if need be, anyone may request a second opinion if they feel my review is not following the GA criteria. Thanks. Wugapodes [thɔk] [kantʃɻɪbz] 23:08, 11 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Checklist edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused (see summary style):  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Comments edit

If the comment is numbered, it must be addressed for the article to pass, if it is bulleted, it's an optional suggestion or comment that you don't need to act on right now.
When I quote things, you can use ctrl+f to search the page for the specific line I quoted.

  1. "It has not been specifically verified if Hijo del Espanto I also has the rights to the name of Mini-Estrella Espantito ("Little Terror") or not, since he was given the name by Espanto II originally. With Espantito pre-dating the claim of Hijo del Espanto I, it could explain why he is allowed to use the name freely, but the name "Espantito II" was only used very briefly in 1999." I don't really understand this. It confused me because it reads like Hijo I wrestled as Espantito at one point but I thought that was a different wrestler? Or that Hijo I gave Espantito the name? Also, Espantito II is new and confusing because it just sorta comes out of nowhere.
    I agree it was not clearly written. I have tried to clarify it a bit. Basically Espantito made his debut and was allowed to use the Espantito name prior to the date where El Hijo del Espanto I (who is a different guy) was given the rights to the name "Espanto". I removed the reference to Espantito II here.
  2. Also, "...it could explain why he is allowed to use the name freely..." seems rather speculative and WP:SYNTH-y so should be specifically cited.
    I removed the speculative part, I agree it's speculative so I just yanked it out.

Results edit

On Hold for 7 daysWugapodes [thɔk] [kantʃɻɪbz] 00:16, 18 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • @Wugapodes: - I have tried to address the comments for the name ownership section.  MPJ-US  08:00, 18 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Promoted 7 reviews down, 1 review to go! You've been doing great work so far, keep it up. Wugapodes [thɔk] [kantʃɻɪbz] 01:30, 19 June 2016 (UTC)Reply