 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
thepeerage.com edit
hepeerage.com displayed the 5th lord also called James and 10th as George, is that something wrong? Matthew_hk tc 14:35, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
- I would back The Scots Peerage over thepeerage.com any day. However, since thepeerage.com purports to cite Cokayne's Complete Peerage, which is a reliable work, I will check my copy of the latter. I am presently away from home, so it may be a few days...
- 45ossington (talk) 07:49, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- Have now checked. Cokayne agrees with Douglas and the succession as presented here.
- 45ossington (talk) 15:50, 6 April 2010 (UTC)