Talk:London Ski jumping competition 1950

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Removed text

edit

The following text was removed from the article:

The second jump was on 30 - 31 March 1951 and was run on similar lines. A formal Oxford v Cambridge event was held and the 2 teams from the Universities were sent to Norway in advance to train for the event. Some 35,000 spectators witnessed the second event, which was hampered by heavy rain.[citation needed]

It is not supported by any reference, and directly contradicts the statements in the BBC article that the event was "never held again". DES (talk) 03:31, 4 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Neither of the external links goes directly to a relevant page at this time. They may be broken or insufficiently specific. DES (talk) 03:32, 4 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

First in London

edit

The BBC article says that "It was the first time ski jumping had been seen by most of the crowd." but does not say that this was the first such event in London. DES (talk) 03:35, 4 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on London Ski jumping competition 1950 & 1951. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:46, 9 March 2016 (UTC)Reply