Talk:Lockean proviso
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lockean proviso article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 February 2021 and 17 March 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Benberg11. Peer reviewers: Owenpayne2000.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Robert Nozick edit
"coined by political philosopher Robert Nozick" - really? --—Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthew238 (talk • contribs)
I doubt it. This article is not very good. Crashola 20:58, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- How could it be improved? @Crashola: Jonpatterns (talk) 10:51, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Geoist/Georgist edit
Locke's proviso has been used by geoists and socialists to point to land acquisition as illegitimate without compensation.
This line uses the less common Geoist in flavor of Georgist. Georgist would be understood by more people. Jonpatterns (talk) 10:48, 21 January 2014 (UTC)